requestId:684c3e2c269f60.03386989.
Yao Yang: Is the new cold war coming?
Accessor: Yao Yang
Accessor: “Civilization Huo”
Source: Author authorized by Confucianism. Originally published by “Civilization Huo” April 2020 issue
Time: Confucius was in the 2570 year of the Gengzi fourth month, Ji Hai
Japanese
[Reading] Recently, “Civilization” interviewed Yao Yang, a professor at the Beijing National Development Research Institute, to cover the changes in China’s relationship with the Eastern world (especially american) after the epidemic, the future direction of China’s economy and the world economy, and the ability of economic theory innovation in crisis times, and other issues, and it does not look like a wandering cat. “Discover a profound discussion.
Teacher Yao Yang believes that under the epidemic, China’s biggest challenge is that Oriental will launch the most basic attack on China’s registrar and value, and a new type of cold war with ideological and shape can come. In order to face this serious challenge, China must combine the times and continue traditions to accelerate the reconstruction of its own verbal system, and make sufficient and useful explanations of the advantages, lack and translation logic of China’s system on the basis of abandoning past words. He also pointed out that although China and the United States have formed a competition in the three aspects of identity form, geopolitics and technology, the two countries still have a wide space for cooperation in trade, international order, counter-terrorism and development support, which is the key point that the new cold war zone is different from the old cold war.
Regarding the direction of China’s economy and world economy in the post-epidemic era, Teacher Yao Yang believes that the epidemic will not and should not reverse the trend of globalization. In the future, the adjustment of global industry links will not lead to “destroying” or “towards China” consequences. China’s position in global industry links can actually be strengthened. Due to the epidemic, the american economy has fallen into Lushan. Although the continuous time of this Lushan is not as good as that of the 20th century and 30th century, Lushan’s depth is far beyond that of the 20th century. Moreover, although the american platform’s market-rescue measures can boost economic consequences in the short term, it will only add the probability of a new and more powerful financial crisis in the long term, and we must be prepared.
This article is a special report on the “Epidemic Changes China and the World”Baobao.comCivilization Bureau. It was reviewed by Teacher Yao Yang and only represents the author’s views for you to think about it.
Is the “new cold war” coming?
“Civilization Hunting”:We have noticed that during this COVID-19 epidemic, many Eastern media and politicians are not particularly friendly to China. Do you think it willThis trend is formed: Due to this epidemic, the Oriental World believes that there will be a most basic PK between the Central and Eastern countries in terms of systemic and value perspectives, so it abandons the favorable conflicts between some parts of the Oriental World, and joins together to fight against China in an ideological state. That is to say, using demonizing the epidemic in China as a starting point, conducting a wide range of players in the Oriental Society, and entering the so-called “new cold war”. Is this capable of being strong?
Yao Yang:I think this kind of energy is quite high, and even from a certain level, it has now formed a “new cold war”. I think there are two reasons for this situation.
First of all, there is the need for Eastern politicians to “scatter”. This epidemic was indeed outbreak in Wuhan first, and we should have some trouble at the beginning. But now looking back, the early response is almost all countries experienced by accident. At most after January 23, Eastern countries knew that the virus could spread, but it took a month and a half to take no action, and even when the epidemic in Italy was as serious as the epidemic, other countries still did not take action until it broke out in mid-March.
Once our country takes action, it quickly controls the epidemic and the first one is to get out of the epidemic. In Eastern society, sentimental people have criticized China for its long and effective control over the epidemic. But now, when some politicians in the East see that the epidemic in their country is so serious, they start to blame China, saying that China has not told us in advance. This is very different. You should take action in the country after January 23 at most. American has stopped flying in China. Why don’t there be any precautions in the country?
In fact, the design methods of officials in some Eastern countries should be less than that of officials in Wuhan. From the perspective of officials, they definitely hope to use some less real methods to control the epidemic. The price and social impact of the lockdown are so big that it will be difficult for anyone to make such a decision.
Secondly, look at it one step further. Now Eastern Europe wants to turn this problem into a regulatory problem. They say that China can do such a strict prevention and control method because you are a non-governmental society, so you have such great power and ability to do this job. After the epidemic, the East is afraid that China’s political system will have a starting point, and the Oriental world will be able to join forces to launch a most basic challenge to China’s regulatory system. This is the biggest challenge for China. He would not discuss how many influences China has released and provided a lot of support to foreign countries in its fight against the epidemic. They would onlyCapture your body to solve problems and join forces to attack and pursue China. Politicians in several major countries in the East have mentioned this, which is a serious challenge that we need to face in the future.
At this point, I think Chinese scholars—especially some Chinese scholars—should be proud to speak out in theory about the philosophical foundation of China’s political system? What are its advantages? What is its weakness? In short, we should actively explain the transformation logic of China’s system, and should break through the dichotomy of authority vs. the main bureau, and analyze China’s political system in an argumentative manner from the perspective of the bureau.
“Civilization Evil”:The unrestrained theories led by Britain and the United States seem to have a historical habit when fighting against rivals – that is, demonizing the opponent in the ideological situation, and then mobilizing the whole society to fight against opponents. But China should be useful for and control the epidemic, the Chinese authorities’ emphasis on life and responsibility, and the popular aged in Oriental society also see it. Therefore, is there also a difficulty in the fact that Oriental politicians are trying to motivate Oriental Society to launch a “new type of cold war” against China on the grounds of the epidemic? Because neither the resources nor the sources of this kind of agent are particularly sufficient.
Yao Yang:The popular aging in Eastern countries is the most basic and cares about China. Before the outbreak, no one was concerned about the work that occurred in China. How did the epidemic in China be resolved? He said in a panic: “Do you want to drink some hot water? I’ll go and burn it.” They didn’t understand. I used to have some beliefs about the mainstream media in american, and I think they can report China more fairly. But after Trump stepped down, I found that the media’s affairs and discussions about China were completely different from the past, including many people who love China and even many scholars who studied China. Their attitudes have changed and are the most basic changes. I used to think that a general in a civilian country like american could not change the thinking of the master or the direction of discussion. However, after I found out that after Trump stepped down, he had indeed changed the direction of discussion, especially the entire american’s understanding of China.
On the contrary, the epidemic in american is so severe that many people have passed away, but american has no special feelings about it.In a country with a choice, if the bureau does what it should do, and many people die, there is no way, and the public can only accept it. It is precisely because of such political and social civilization that the politicians dare to say that more than american people are about to die. But under a system like this, how can this be done! Lao Zi couldn’t accept it. From a traditional perspective, our country must have almost unlimited responsibility to the people. But such as american, the choice of a national government may not be the case. The agency under the selection is only responsible for the election of american. They pay attention to their responsibilities, not their responsibilities. If the bureau completes the work that is done and wants to die, it means tha
發佈留言